![]() “Its disposal for a short-term gain will impede economic innovation and growth.” ‘Unacceptable and unnecessary’ “The PAF should have been retained as a public data set, as a national asset, free to all, for the benefit and the widest benefit of the UK economy,” the MPs say in a damning remark. But one expert in the field says that the value put on the file - of more than £500m - is vastly overstated after his own company reproduced it in its entirety for the 2011 Census in a one-off project for just £10m.Ī report from the Public Administration Select Committee has slammed the selloff of the Postcode Address File (PAF), which contains data connecting the 1.8m postcodes in the UK to each of 28m postal addresses, saying that it doubted some of the assurances given by ministers including Michael Fallon, the Conservative MP who is minister for Business and Enterprise, about continued access to versions of PAF.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |